Evaluation
COSTS. The region's total transportation
costs would increase 21% to build and operate a light-rail system that will serve less than 1/2 of 1% of the population.
The
Triangle's over-all 25-yr public cost for transportation would increase $5.7bn -- from
$16.0bn to $21.7bn. At full
build-out light-rail would carry 0.02 percent of the region's total person-trips (16,233
person-trips per day vs. 10, 291, 804 person-trips per day on all other
modes).
The Plan targets suburban commuters who would be willing to undertake a bus-to-rail-to-bus trip,
a travel pattern that federal officials say, "cannot be found on any existing commuter rail service in the United States." This is why the Plan produces such low ridership at such high costs per rider.
BENEFITS TO CAPTIVE RIDERS. The real beneficiaries of the Plan are the 10,000 or so transportation disadvantaged, living without a car or bus in the Triangle's suburban fringes. They make up the bulk of the Plan's commuter-bus riders, 21,222 daily passenger-trips. Unfortunately, the service is poorly designed for them because the market for the regional commuter-bus routes is the 99% of us who drive, not the 1% of us living in the suburbs without a car.
BENEFITS TO CHOICE RIDERS. Transit planners have stopped using the terms "choice" and "captive" to identify their riders. Since the 1990's almost all transit riders, outside the biggest cities, are poor and without a choice. Of the riders who do have an license and a car, they ride because they do not have the money to pay for gas to get to work. They are not "attracted" to transit.
BENEFITS TO HEROIC RIDERS. There is one other type of rider, new to transportation planners, who
is "attracted" to transit. Mostly men in their thirties or forties who commute using both bicycles and buses. They commute under what can only be described as heroic circumstances and for the most altruistic reasons. Regularly running across 15-501 in heavy traffic to the nearest bus stop. Bicycling from home to bus, rain and snow, through heavy traffic on I-40. Proud to spend 90 min to get to work when a trip by car would take no more than 10-15 min.
There aren't many heroic riders but when it comes to promoting transit they make up for their low numbers with extreme enthusiasm for the transit cause.
BENEFITS TO DRIVERS. To the extent that the Plan does relieve highway congestion, the more people will drive.
Vehicle-trips and vehicle-miles of travel will go up due to the implementation of the "transit" plan.
Traffic congestion would be somewhat reduced. 14% of freeway drivers will
experience congestion under the No-Change alternative but only 5% of freeway drivers would experience
congestion if the light-rail/commuter-bus plan were implemented. Vehicle speeds in the Triangle would increase 5mph to an average 47mph.
The LRTP admits that it does not meet the MPO's own targets for performance and effectiveness saying, "The percent of SOV (single occupant vehicle) trip share and the percent of non-motorized trip share fall well short of the targets."
In other words, the MPO's, knowing their transit plan will perform poorly and ineffectively, approved it anyway. According to Durham's mayor, "We know we can't solve all our transportation problems by building more roads and more highways. We also know we aren't going to solve all our transportation problems with [more] transit but I think by having both we have an opportunity to continue the quality of life that we have been experiencing in this community."
Mayor Bell believes that wider roads and more transit are our only two options. He knows that the quality of life that our community wants to continue, is suburban life -- which is just another way of saying, life spent behind the wheel, driving from place-to-place. If the regional transit plan is carried out, only 5% of drivers would be inconvenienced by freeway traffic congestion, instead of 14% if it is not approved.
The budget to extend and widen highways remains the same whether or not we pay for a regional light-rail and commuter-bus system. Hoorah.